Q 1 :

Assertion (A): 9x² - 3x - 20 = 0 ⇒ (3x - 5)(3x + 4) = 0.The roots are calculated by splitting the middle term.

Reason (R): To factorise ax² + bx + c = 0, we write in the form ax² + bx + bx + c = 0  such that b + b = b and bb = ac.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true.

     

(1)

We have, 9x² - 3x - 20 = 0
⇒ 9x² - 15x + 12x - 20 = 0 ⇒ 3x(3x - 5) + 4(3x - 5) = 0
⇒ (3x - 5)(3x + 4) = 0
Hence, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

 



Q 2 :

Assertion (A): The roots of equation x² – 7x + 12 = 0 are x = 3 and x = 4.

Reason (R): The splitting of middle term of the equation x² – 7x + 12 = 0 is
(x²  7/2 x  7/2 x + 12 = 0).

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
     

  • A is true, but R is false.
     

  • A is false, but R is true.
     

(3)

We have, x² – 7x + 12 = 0 ⇒ x² – 4x – 3x + 12 = 0 ⇒ x(x – 4) – 3(x – 4) = 0
⇒ (x – 4)(x – 3) = 0 ⇒ x = 3, 4. ∴ Assertion (A) is true.

In Reason (R): Given, x² – 7x + 12 = x² – (7/2)x – (7/2)x + 12 = 0
This is not middle term splitting because
(–7/2)x × (–7/2)x ≠ 12x²

 



Q 3 :

Assertion (A): If  5 + 7 is a root of a quadratic equation with rational coefficients, then its other root is 5  7

Reason (R): Irrational roots of a quadratic equation with rational coefficients occur in conjugate pairs.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true.

     

(1)

Since irrational roots of a quadratic equation always occur in conjugate pairs, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

 



Q 4 :

Assertion (A): 2x²  4x + 3 = 0 is a quadratic equation.

Reason (R): All polynomials of degree n, when n is a whole number, can be treated as quadratic equations.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(3)

Yes, 2x²  4x + 3 = 0 is a quadratic equation because the degree of the equation is 2. However, not all polynomials of degree n can be treated as quadratic equations.

If n = 1, the equation is called a linear equation, and if n = 3, it is called a cubic equation.

Therefore, Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.



Q 5 :

Assertion (A): If the difference of roots of the equation x²  2px + q = 0 is same as the difference of the roots of the equation x²  2rx + s = 0, then s  q = r²  p².

Reason (R): The roots of the quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0 are given by x = -b ± D2a, where D is the discriminant.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(2)

Clearly, Reason (R) is true. Let α, β be the roots of x²  2px + q = 0 and γ, δ be the roots of x²  2rx + s = 0.

Then, α + β = 2p, αβ = q, and γ + δ = 2r, γδ = s. It is given that α  β = γ  δ.

 (α  β)² = (γ  δ)²

  (α + β)²  4αβ = (γ + δ)²  4γδ 

 (2p)²  4q = (2r)²  4s 

 4p²  4q = 4r²  4s  s  q = r²  p².

So, Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).



Q 6 :

Assertion (A): The quadratic equation 9x² + 3kx + 4 = 0 has equal roots for k = ±4.

Reason (R): If the discriminant of a quadratic equation is equal to zero, then the roots of the equation are real and equal.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(1)

We have the quadratic equation 9x² + 3kx + 4 = 0.
For roots to be equal, D = 0.

(3k)²  4×9×4 = 0  9k²  144 = 0 

 9k² = 144  k² = 16 

 k = ±4.

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

 



Q 7 :

Assertion (A): The quadratic equation 4x²  12x + 9 = 0 has repeated roots.

Reason (R): The quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0, a  0, has equal roots if D > 0.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

     

(3)

Given, 4x²  12x + 9 = 0. Discriminant, D = (12)²  4×4×9 = 144  144 = 0.

Hence, the equation has equal (repeated) roots. Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.

 



Q 8 :

Assertion (A): The equation ax² + bx + c = 0 has two real roots always.

Reason (R): The sum of roots of ax² + bx + c = 0 is b/a and the product of roots is c/a.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(4)

For a quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0, we know:
(i) If b²  4ac > 0, then the equation has two real and distinct roots.
(ii) If b²  4ac = 0, then the equation has two real and equal roots.
(iii) If b²  4ac < 0, then the equation has no real roots.

And, sum of roots = −b/a and product of roots = c/a.
Hence, Assertion (A) is false but Reason (R) is true.