Assertion (A): 9x² - 3x - 20 = 0 ⇒ (3x - 5)(3x + 4) = 0.The roots are calculated by splitting the middle term.
Reason (R): To factorise ax² + bx + c = 0, we write in the form such that .
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
A is true, but R is false.
A is false, but R is true.
(1)
We have, 9x² - 3x - 20 = 0
⇒ 9x² - 15x + 12x - 20 = 0 ⇒ 3x(3x - 5) + 4(3x - 5) = 0
⇒ (3x - 5)(3x + 4) = 0
Hence, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Assertion (A): The roots of equation x² – 7x + 12 = 0 are x = 3 and x = 4.
Reason (R): The splitting of middle term of the equation x² – 7x + 12 = 0 is
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
A is true, but R is false.
A is false, but R is true.
(3)
We have, x² – 7x + 12 = 0 ⇒ x² – 4x – 3x + 12 = 0 ⇒ x(x – 4) – 3(x – 4) = 0
⇒ (x – 4)(x – 3) = 0 ⇒ x = 3, 4. ∴ Assertion (A) is true.
In Reason (R): Given, x² – 7x + 12 = x² – (7/2)x – (7/2)x + 12 = 0
This is not middle term splitting because
(–7/2)x × (–7/2)x ≠ 12x²
Assertion (A): If is a root of a quadratic equation with rational coefficients, then its other root is
Reason (R): Irrational roots of a quadratic equation with rational coefficients occur in conjugate pairs.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true.
(1)
Since irrational roots of a quadratic equation always occur in conjugate pairs, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Assertion (A): is a quadratic equation.
Reason (R): All polynomials of degree n, when n is a whole number, can be treated as quadratic equations.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true
(3)
Yes, is a quadratic equation because the degree of the equation is 2. However, not all polynomials of degree n can be treated as quadratic equations.
If n = 1, the equation is called a linear equation, and if n = 3, it is called a cubic equation.
Therefore, Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A): If the difference of roots of the equation is same as the difference of the roots of the equation, then
Reason (R): The roots of the quadratic equation are given by , where D is the discriminant.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true
(2)
Clearly, Reason (R) is true. Let α, β be the roots of
Then, . It is given that
So, Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Assertion (A): The quadratic equation
Reason (R): If the discriminant of a quadratic equation is equal to zero, then the roots of the equation are real and equal.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true
(1)
We have the quadratic equation
For roots to be equal, D = 0.
⇒
.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Assertion (A): The quadratic equation has repeated roots.
Reason (R): The quadratic equation , has equal roots if D > 0.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true
(3)
Given,
Hence, the equation has equal (repeated) roots. Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A): The equation has two real roots always.
Reason (R): The sum of roots of and the product of roots is c/a.
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true, but R is false
A is false, but R is true
(4)
For a quadratic equation we know:
(i) then the equation has two real and distinct roots.
(ii) , then the equation has two real and equal roots.
(iii) , then the equation has no real roots.
And, sum of roots = −b/a and product of roots = c/a.
Hence, Assertion (A) is false but Reason (R) is true.