Q 1 :

Assertion (A): 6n never ends with the digit zero, where n is natural number.
Reason (R): Any number ends with digit zero, if its prime factor is of the form 2m×5n, where m, n are natural numbers.

  • Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

     

  • Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

     

  • Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.

     

  • Assertion (A) is false but Reason (R) is true.

     

(1)

Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).

6n=(2×3)n=2n×3n , Its prime factors do not contain 5 i.e., of the form 2m×5n,

where m, n are natural numbers. Hence, 6n never ends with the digit zero.

 



Q 2 :

Assertion (A): If product of two numbers is 5780 and their HCF is 17, then their LCM is 340
Reason (R) : HCF is always a factor of LCM

  • Both assertion (A) and reason (R) are true and reason (R) is the correct explanation of assertion (A)

     

  • Both assertion (A) and reason (R) are true and reason (R) is not the correct explanation of assertion (A)

     

  • Assertion (A) is true but reason (R) is false.

     

  • Assertion (A) is false but reason (R) is true.

     

(2)

Both assertion (A) and reason (R) are true and reason (R) is not the correct explanation of assertion (A)

 



Q 3 :

Assertion (A): The HCF of two numbers is 16 and their product is 3072. Then their LCM = 162.
Reason (R): If a and b are two positive integers, then their HCF × LCM = a × b.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true.

     

(4)

As we know that HCF(a, b) × LCM(a, b) = a × b.
But 16 × 162 = 2592, i.e., 2592 ≠ 3072



Q 4 :

Assertion (A): If LCM(p, q) = 30 and HCF(p, q) = 5, then p × q = 150.
Reason (R): LCM of (a, b) × HCF of (a, b) = a × b.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
     

  • A is true, but R is false.
     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(1)

We know that LCM(p, q) × HCF(p, q) = p × q.
⇒ 30 × 5 = p × q ⇒ 150 = p × q.



Q 5 :

Assertion (A): HCF(306, 657) = 9, and LCM(306, 657) = 22338.

Reason (R): If a and b are two positive integers and HCF(a, b) = 9, then LCM(a, b) = (a + b)/2.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false.
     

  • A is false, but R is true.

     

(3)

We have, HCF(306, 657) = 9
⇒ LCM(306, 657) = (306 × 657) / 9 = 22338.

 



Q 6 :

Assertion (A): 6n can end with the digit 0 for any natural number n.

Reason (R): Any positive integer ending with the digits 0 or 5 is divisible by 5 and so its prime factorisation must contain the prime 5.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true.

     

(4)

As we know that any number whose prime factors consist of 2? × 5?, where m and n are natural numbers, can end with the digit 0, but 62 has only prime factors as 2 and 3. So 62 cannot end with the digit 0.



Q 7 :

Assertion (A): The HCF of two numbers is 4 and their product is 38784. Then their LCM is 9696.

Reason (R): LCM(a, b) × HCF(a, b) = a × b.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

     

  • A is true, but R is false

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(1)

For Assertion (A): Given, HCF of two numbers = 4 and product of these numbers = 38784.
We know that HCF × LCM = Product of numbers.
⇒ LCM = 38784 ÷ 4 = 9696.

 



Q 8 :

Assertion (A): 2 is a rational number.

Reason (R): The square root of all positive integers are irrationals.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(3)

Clearly, 2 is a rational number but square root of all positive integers are not always irrational.
It may be rational or irrational number.
For example, √2 is an irrational number but √4 is not an irrational number because √4 = 2 which is rational.
So, Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false

 



Q 9 :

Assertion (A): √5 is an irrational number.

Reason (R): If m is an odd number greater than 1, then √m is irrational.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(3)

Clearly, √5 is irrational so Assertion (A) is true.
Let m = 9 ⇒ √m = √9 = 3 which is rational.
So, for m is an odd number greater than 1, √m need not be irrational always.
∴ Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false.

 



Q 10 :

Assertion (A): 15/1600 is a terminating decimal fraction.
Reason (R): If x = p/q is a rational number, such that the prime factorisation of q is of the form 2n5m,
where n, m are non-negative integers, then x = p/q is a terminating decimal fraction.

  • Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

     

  • Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
     

  • A is true, but R is false.

     

  • A is false, but R is true

     

(1)

For Assertion (A)
We have, 15/1600 = 15 / (2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 × 5) = 15 / (2? × 5²)
⇒ The prime factorisation of denominator 1600 of 15/1600 is of the form 2?5?, where n, m are non-negative integers.
So, 15/1600 is a terminating decimal fraction.
Hence, Assertion (A) is true.
Also Reason (R) is true because it is the statement of a known theorem which says
“If x = p/q is a rational number, such that the prime factorisation of q is of the form 2?5?, where n, m are non-negative integers,
then x = p/q is a terminating decimal fraction.”
Also, it helps to prove Assertion (A) and so Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).